| From: | Chris Travers <chris(at)travelamericas(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-19 05:59:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4355E0DA.5030105@travelamericas.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>
>
>>Strangely a pgsql to oracle exporter is a good thing. It'd be a great
>>feature of PostgreSQL. Imagine how many people would start on
>>PostgreSQL if they KNEW that one day they could easily move to Oracle if
>>they needed to. Risk management.
>>
>>
>
>Problem is: to offer such a thing with a straight face, we'd have to
>confine ourselves to an Oracle-subset version of SQL. For instance,
>lose the ability to distinguish empty-string from NULL.
>
>
Funny how many Oracle DBA's don't seem to be aware of this "feature" ....
Funny how many of those that are seem to think that this is perfectly OK
:-( On the other hand, it is one weakness of Oracle that has not gotten
a major airing in public... It might be worth saving for when the FUD
starts to fly :-)
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron technology Consulting
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-10-19 06:12:29 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-19 05:35:25 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2005-10-19 06:02:03 | Re: Reverse engineering SW |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-10-19 05:44:02 | Re: unsigned types |