Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Chris Travers <chris(at)verkiel(dot)metatrontech(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Date: 2005-10-19 05:35:25
Message-ID: 17988.1129700125@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Strangely a pgsql to oracle exporter is a good thing. It'd be a great
> feature of PostgreSQL. Imagine how many people would start on
> PostgreSQL if they KNEW that one day they could easily move to Oracle if
> they needed to. Risk management.

Problem is: to offer such a thing with a straight face, we'd have to
confine ourselves to an Oracle-subset version of SQL. For instance,
lose the ability to distinguish empty-string from NULL.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2005-10-19 05:59:54 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-10-19 05:11:10 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-10-19 05:44:02 Re: unsigned types
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-10-19 05:11:10 Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase