| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Chris Travers <chris(at)verkiel(dot)metatrontech(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-19 05:11:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4355D56E.30107@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
> As Andrew noted, we've already heard plenty of FUD from Oracle. What
> we've not seen is a FUD campaign based on serious study of our
> weaknesses --- they've only bothered to muster transparent attacks on
> "open source DBs" in general. My prediction is that the next step will
> be FUD that's really designed specifically against Postgres.
I admit I must have missed all this '.org FUD' - is it still around. I
really don't know what you guys are referring to.
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-19 05:35:25 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-10-19 05:10:18 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-19 05:35:25 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2005-10-19 05:10:18 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |