| From: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chris Travers <chris(at)metatrontech(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-16 23:35:23 |
| Message-ID: | 4352E3BB.5030607@empires.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Martín Marqués wrote:
> El Dom 16 Oct 2005 13:48, Jeff Davis escribió:
>
>>If not, what's the advantage to MySQL using FirebirdSQL as opposed to,
>>say, PostgreSQL?
>
>
> I think it's stupid to even think about an emmbedded PostgreSQL in MySQL. The
> advantage of using InnoDB emmbeded in MySQL is that the former doesn't,
> AFAIK, an SQL languaje. So Innodb gives transaction and RI, and MySQL gives
> an SQL languaje.
>
> Now, what would MySQL give PostgreSQL?
>
That was my point. FirebirdSQL already provides the SQL language, so
what does MySQL offer that FirebirdSQL doesn't?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-10-17 09:05:54 | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-10-16 23:32:35 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | talenat | 2005-10-16 23:54:13 | Collate problem |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-10-16 23:32:35 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |