From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Open source database comparison |
Date: | 2005-10-15 15:11:07 |
Message-ID: | 43511C0B.9000009@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Leonard Soetedjo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I saw this open source database comparison:
>> http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/29480?trk=DXRSS_LATEST
>>
>> I'm quite new to PostgreSQL features, but shouldn't PostgreSQL already
>> have "SQL stored procedure"? Is "SQL stored procedure" something
>> different from the usual stored procedure? And it also mark PostgreSQL
>> as having no full-text search. Isn't Tsearch2 being used to do that,
>> even though it's not on by default?
>>
>> I'm just concerned if the matrix is giving the wrong info about
>> PostgreSQL :)
>>
>>
> I am a active writer for that site. I will contact my editor.
While you're doing that: pgAdmin III *does* support simultaneous
execution of queries.
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-10-15 16:31:25 | Re: Open source database comparison |
Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2005-10-15 14:58:50 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase |