Re: Open source database comparison

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open source database comparison
Date: 2005-10-15 15:11:07
Message-ID: 43511C0B.9000009@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Leonard Soetedjo wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I saw this open source database comparison:
>> http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/29480?trk=DXRSS_LATEST
>>
>> I'm quite new to PostgreSQL features, but shouldn't PostgreSQL already
>> have "SQL stored procedure"? Is "SQL stored procedure" something
>> different from the usual stored procedure? And it also mark PostgreSQL
>> as having no full-text search. Isn't Tsearch2 being used to do that,
>> even though it's not on by default?
>>
>> I'm just concerned if the matrix is giving the wrong info about
>> PostgreSQL :)
>>
>>
> I am a active writer for that site. I will contact my editor.

While you're doing that: pgAdmin III *does* support simultaneous
execution of queries.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-15 16:31:25 Re: Open source database comparison
Previous Message Ron Mayer 2005-10-15 14:58:50 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase