Re: fine tuned database dump/reload?

From: Dan Armbrust <daniel(dot)armbrust(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: fine tuned database dump/reload?
Date: 2005-10-14 15:24:55
Message-ID: 434FCDC7.5010609@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Since no one else has mentioned it, there has been discussion this week
> on one of the lists (probably -general or -hackers) about expanding the
> capabilities of pg_dump. I've advocated for allowing a file that
> specifies what objects to dump and what kind of filtering to apply to
> the name. Allowing for only dumping certain rows in a table (applying a
> WHERE clause) would be a neat addition to that.

That would be exactly what I need - the ability to apply a where clause.
That - and the ability to specify multiple tables to dump, instead of
just one.

Because currently, I still get into foreign key trouble in this scenario:

I drop data (and only data) from database A. This data has foreign key
constraints. I want to load this data into database B - where the
tables already exist, they already have foreign keys, and there is some
existing data.

My dump from database A won't load - because the tables were dumped in
the wrong order to satisfy the foreign keys on the reload - so the only
way I can load this data back into an existing database is to dump each
table individually, and reload in the proper order, or manually drop my
foreign keys while I load the data.

Both ways are a pain - and it makes it overly difficult to export/import
chunks of data from a database.

Dan

--
****************************
Daniel Armbrust
Biomedical Informatics
Mayo Clinic Rochester
daniel.armbrust(at)mayo.edu
http://informatics.mayo.edu/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2005-10-14 15:48:39 Re: On "multi-master"
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2005-10-14 15:20:41 Re: On "multi-master"