| From: | Bricklen Anderson <BAnderson(at)PresiNET(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dan Armbrust <daniel(dot)armbrust(dot)list(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: fine tuned database dump/reload? |
| Date: | 2005-10-11 17:00:24 |
| Message-ID: | 434BEFA8.9030002@PresiNET.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Dan Armbrust wrote:
>>
> Now I'm just filling the mailing list with mis-information. It actually
> ignores all but the last -t flag - so this only allows me to specify one
> table at a time, rather than several tables.
>
> I need to write up my use case so the maintainers can see why I want to
> be able to dump things in such a specific way - its not for backup
> purposes - so I'm kind of misusing the intent of the tool. More info in
> a bit.
>
> Dan
>
Disregard my last reply, yours hadn't arrived yet.
--
_______________________________
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does
not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in
error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
_______________________________
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Stapleton | 2005-10-11 17:01:55 | Re: Cluster/redundancy question |
| Previous Message | Dan Armbrust | 2005-10-11 16:58:57 | Re: fine tuned database dump/reload? |