Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, J B <jbwellsiv(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Date: 2005-10-11 11:53:57
Message-ID: 434BA7D5.7040308@wildenhain.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Magnus Hagander schrieb:
>>>I have thought about that, however I would at least at some
>>
...
>
> Or integrating them with the web. Not sure if any of the "popular
> bugtrackers" support that today, or if they all want to "be their own
> site" that we'd link to. That'd work, of course, but it'd be nicer to
> get something that actually looks like a part of the site. Without too
> much work of course ;-)

This is at least true for Trac - you got the templates and you
can have it work in a virtual directory so to say.

(No, I dont get money from them ;-))

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-10-11 12:43:51 Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker
Previous Message Reinhard Max 2005-10-11 11:28:43 Re: PostgreSQL missing in SuSE 10?