Re: new buildfarm with gcc & clang "trunk" -Werror?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new buildfarm with gcc & clang "trunk" -Werror?
Date: 2018-03-28 21:53:30
Message-ID: 4349d6bd-79c3-83d2-56d9-a180942f6bf3@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/28/18 04:06, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Would the project feel appropriate to:
>
> - fix these warnings (other than putting -Wno-format-truncation or
> similar workarounds...).

I've been tracking gcc-8, and I have a patch ready, but these things
change a bit with every compiler snapshot, so I'm waiting until things
settle down.

> - add permanent gcc/clang trunk beasts with -Werror
> (if so, I'd suggest cannonball & seanettle for the names).

I would not like that. The build farm success should ideally be a
function of correct PostgreSQL code, not external factors. If an
in-progress compiler does funny things, what are we supposed to do about
that?

Generally, fixing up PostgreSQL for a new compiler release isn't a major
effort and can be done briefly before the release of the compiler.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-28 21:54:03 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-03-28 21:31:49 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v12