Re: Upcoming re-releases

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upcoming re-releases
Date: 2006-02-09 20:16:29
Message-ID: 4343.1139516189@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Maybe this should be a configure flag, just like the port number is.

It is ... that isn't the issue, the problem is exactly that Debian
chooses to exercise the option to make their installations different
from everyone else's.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-02-09 20:23:59 Re: [GENERAL] Sequences/defaults and pg_dump
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-02-09 20:16:10 Re: [GENERAL] Sequences/defaults and pg_dump