Re: Request for qualified column names

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Reggie Burnett <rykr(at)bellsouth(dot)net>, "'Dave Cramer'" <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, "'PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for qualified column names
Date: 2003-01-28 22:21:55
Message-ID: 4342.1043792515@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Dave Cramer says it is needed for the jdbc spec, somehow.

Does the JDBC spec really require the database to provide functionality
that's not in the SQL spec? I kinda doubt that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reggie Burnett 2003-01-28 22:23:23 Re: Request for qualified column names
Previous Message Gordan Bobic 2003-01-28 22:12:15 Re: list server problems?