| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Peacetree <rjpeace(at)earthlink(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| Date: | 2005-10-01 15:19:26 |
| Message-ID: | 433EA8FE.8050103@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Ron Peacetree wrote:
>The good news is all this means it's easy to demonstrate that we can
>improve the performance of our sorting functionality.
>
>Assuming we get the abyssmal physical IO performance fixed...
>(because until we do, _nothing_ is going to help us as much)
>
>
>
I for one would be paying more attention if such a demonstration were
forthcoming, in the form of a viable patch and some benchmark results.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-01 15:28:08 | Re: Making pgxs builds work with a relocated installation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-01 14:38:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Found small issue with OUT params |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-01 15:44:15 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| Previous Message | Ron Peacetree | 2005-10-01 14:22:40 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |