From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Date: | 2009-04-11 19:02:58 |
Message-ID: | 4338.1239476578@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Having an extra column in \df for "Windowing" was rejected out of hand.
> Why?
I'd definitely support adding it to \df+. Basic \df might be a harder
sell, because it still does mostly fit in 80 columns now, but would
certainly no longer do so with another column.
> And has it occurred to anyone that a pg_functions view is *way* overdue?
Too late for 8.4 I'm afraid, but we could talk about it for 8.5. What
have you got in mind that would be different from \df?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-04-11 19:07:51 | Re: Closing some 8.4 open items |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-04-11 18:50:29 | Re: Unicode string literals versus the world |