Re: Closing some 8.4 open items

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj(at)pointblue(dot)com(dot)pl>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Date: 2009-04-11 19:02:58
Message-ID: 4338.1239476578@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Having an extra column in \df for "Windowing" was rejected out of hand.
> Why?

I'd definitely support adding it to \df+. Basic \df might be a harder
sell, because it still does mostly fit in 80 columns now, but would
certainly no longer do so with another column.

> And has it occurred to anyone that a pg_functions view is *way* overdue?

Too late for 8.4 I'm afraid, but we could talk about it for 8.5. What
have you got in mind that would be different from \df?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-04-11 19:07:51 Re: Closing some 8.4 open items
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-04-11 18:50:29 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world