From: | Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Paolo Magnoli <pmagnoli(at)systemevolution(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, eg(at)cybertec(dot)at |
Subject: | Re: R: feature proposal ... |
Date: | 2005-09-21 15:55:29 |
Message-ID: | 43318271.3020409@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
>
>> no because a new is not a heap ...
>
>
> Why not use a function with a temporary table?
>
> That way you can pass a table parameter that
> is the temporary table with a select statement
> that you can populate the temp table with.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
hi joshua ...
temp tables are not an option - there is too much data around.
view are better here, i think ...
cheers,
hans
--
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
Schöngrabern 134; A-2020 Hollabrunn
Tel: +43/1/205 10 35 / 340
www.postgresql.at, www.cybertec.at
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-21 15:58:23 | Re: logging blemishes |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-09-21 15:47:42 | Re: R: feature proposal ... |