| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: logging blemishes |
| Date: | 2005-09-20 11:55:41 |
| Message-ID: | 432FF8BD.8000203@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I'm also unclear why we get two lines at the start of each connection -
>>that seems like a bug, or is it due to some sort of protocol
>>negotiation. This is a fresh FC4 machine with only pg 8.0.3 ever installed.
>>
>>
>
>I can not reproduce your problem here with current CVS. I see:
>
> 2005-09-19 22:37:58 EDT LOG: transaction ID wrap limit is 2147484146,
> limited by database "postgres"
> 2005-09-19 22:39:17 EDT [unknown](at)[unknown] 6404 432f7655.1904:1LOG:
> connection received: host=[local] port=
> 2005-09-19 22:39:17 EDT postgres(at)test [local] 6404 432f7655.1904:2LOG:
>
>
>
>
Well, as I said it was with 8.0.3. In fact it was with the distro's
version of 8.0.3. With a vanilla version compiled from our source
tarball I don't see this, so maybe I need to file a bug with RedHat ;-)
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-09-20 12:15:22 | Re: 64-bit API for large objects |
| Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-09-20 11:22:12 | Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? |