Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close pgsql-cygwin?

From: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close pgsql-cygwin?
Date: 2005-09-18 11:07:51
Message-ID: 432D4A87.3020402@x-ray.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32

Magnus Hagander schrieb:
>>It occurs to me that there is no longer any great need to
>>have a separate hackers list for win32 development. Perhaps
>>we should close it down now and keep all development on -hackers?
>
> I also think this is a good idea. The number of "win32 only issues of
> -hacker level" is significantly smaller now, and having to bounce people
> between the lists can be kind of annoying...

I believe we should close pgsql-cygwin also.

The cygwin users should ask at the official cygwin list as described in
the README and CYGWIN announcements, not at the pgsql-cygwin list.
Most problems are cygwin specific, others are carried in the FAQ_README
and the seperate /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/postgresql-x.x.x.README

If so, I'll write a documentation patch.
--
Reini Urban
http://phpwiki.org/

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Felipe Fernandez 2005-09-19 20:13:35 LC_Messages
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-09-17 12:48:05 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close hackers-win32?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2005-09-18 16:13:00 64-bit API for large objects
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-09-17 23:18:14 Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ...

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-09-20 01:17:26 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close hackers-win32?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-09-17 12:48:05 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Time to close hackers-win32?