Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support

From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)seznam(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chuck McDevitt <cmcdevitt(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
Date: 2005-08-25 22:12:04
Message-ID: 430E4234.4050903@seznam.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Possibly, but that's apparently not the only problem. I'm looking at
> the first buildfarm result with this patch,
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=loris&dt=2005-08-25%2018:56:02
>
> The interesting part is the postmaster log at the bottom:
>
> LOG: could not bind IPv4 socket: No error
> HINT: Is another postmaster already running on port 55678? If not, wait a few seconds and retry.
> WARNING: could not create listen socket for "localhost"
> FATAL: could not create any TCP/IP sockets
>
> Apparently, access to IPv4 sockets isn't working either (and the "No
> error" isn't very helpful; would seem we're not reading the right
> status value).

/me kicks brother out of winXP machine to see whats going on

Yep those changes proposed in my previous email fixes IPv4 too.

LOG: database system was shut down at 2005-08-26 00:05:51 [removed
unreadable chars :)]
LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/390CE0
LOG: redo record is at 0/390CE0; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE
LOG: next transaction ID: 562; next OID: 10791
LOG: next MultiXactId: 1; next MultiXactOffset: 0
LOG: database system is ready
LOG: transaction ID wrap limit is 2147484144, limited by database
"postgres"

Looks ok, i don't know what IPv4 has to do with all of this though.

--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-25 22:15:46 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-08-25 22:01:25 Re: Stuff running slooow

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-25 22:15:46 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-25 21:51:24 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed patch to getaddrinfo.c to support