Re: Sleep functions

Greg Stark wrote:

>"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>
>
>
>>Sure it's trivial in various languages, even in trusted PL/Tcl:
>>
>>CREATE FUNCTION sleep(integer) RETURNS void AS $$
>>after [expr $1 * 1000]
>>$$ LANGUAGE pltcl STRICT;
>>
>>
>
>Do any of the trusted languages count branches and abort after some large
>number to prevent trusted code from causing long delays?
>
>
>

I don't believe so. What arbitrary limit would you like to set?

The thing that bothers me slightly about doing this in PLs is that it
might well monkey with the signal handling which could cause very hard
to debug problems. But maybe that's just paranoia - I haven't looked at
it closely.

cheers

andrew