| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Date: | 2005-08-18 03:55:43 |
| Message-ID: | 430406BF.2040406@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>> The column's type is 'xid' which the driver doesn't currently handle,
>> so it gets put into the "wrap it in PGobject" bucket.
>
> Is xid a type of number?
It's an internal backend type; I'm not familiar with the details.
>> Perhaps your server should convert instances of PGobject to their
>> string representations before returning them across RMI.
>
> That's what I'll do. Are there any other classes besides
> org.postgresql.util.PGobject that I have to worry about?
There are other classes for things like intervals and the geometric
types, but they should all be subclasses of PGobject.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-08-18 04:10:44 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-08-18 03:48:52 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-08-18 04:10:44 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Previous Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-08-18 03:48:52 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |