| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Date: | 2005-08-18 04:10:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20050818041044.GA3840@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc |
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:55:43PM +1200, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> >>The column's type is 'xid' which the driver doesn't currently handle,
> >>so it gets put into the "wrap it in PGobject" bucket.
> >
> >Is xid a type of number?
>
> It's an internal backend type; I'm not familiar with the details.
It's an unsigned 4 byte integer.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Cada quien es cada cual y baja las escaleras como quiere" (JMSerrat)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-08-18 04:47:55 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-08-18 03:55:43 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joseph Shraibman | 2005-08-18 04:47:55 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-08-18 03:55:43 | Re: [JDBC] pg_locks.transaction field type |