| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sean Davis <sdavis2(at)mail(dot)nih(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | David <dbree(at)duo-county(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgperl vs dbd-perl |
| Date: | 2005-08-10 03:28:13 |
| Message-ID: | 42F9744D.5000408@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
>>
>>Is PgPerl still viable or is DBD the way to go?
>
>
> DBD::Pg is the way to go, for numerous reasons. DBI is very well supported.
> More importantly, almost all database-related work is done by building on
> DBI. Interfacing your own code with those of others is then relatively
> straightforward. See, for some examples, DBIx::RecordSet or Class::DBI.
> Finally, if you every need to port to another database product (GASP!), DBI
> is fairly easy to adapt (depending on DB-specific SQL).
DBI/DBD is also what Perl considers standard.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Sean
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jtv | 2005-08-10 03:51:48 | Re: Getting results after networking error |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-10 03:07:53 | Re: Getting results after networking error |