Re: per user/database connections limit again

From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)parba(dot)cz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: per user/database connections limit again
Date: 2005-08-03 15:15:36
Message-ID: 42F0DF98.7050702@parba.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

>GUC supports per-user/per-db values.
>
>
We already had discussion here about GUC for this and we agreed that
catalog change is better than new GUC variable in this case.

--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-08-03 15:32:23 ECPG ignores SAVEPOINT if first statement of a transaction
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-08-03 14:31:25 ECPG and escape strings