Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Date: 2005-08-01 14:05:15
Message-ID: 42EE2C1B.3060802@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Dave Page wrote:

>>
>>pg_dir_ls isn't necessary for reading the logfiles;
>>pg_logdir_ls will do
>>this.
>
>
> Err, yes, sorry - that was a thinko.

The list isn't complete. pgadmin uses these three functions for logfile
tracking:

- pg_logdir_ls to list logfiles
- pg_file_length to check for changes of the current logfile
- pg_file_read to retrieve a logfile

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-08-01 14:08:40 Re: per user/database connections limit again
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-01 14:03:59 Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum loose ends