Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?
Date: 2007-09-08 23:05:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Hi Oliver,

I'm working on the other wrapper driver now. I want to finish  
*something* and get it working before I start looking at the issues  
that you raised. As you are eluding to it might just be as  
complicated to get it right in the driver, but at this point I have  
concentrate on the wrapper implementation.

On 8-Sep-07, at 6:57 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> Dave Cramer wrote:
>> It's simpler, there's about half a dozen classes and one if  
>> statement as opposed to implementing the Connection and Statement  
>> interfaces for 3 versions of  jdbc and yet another build system  
>> that does the same.
> How do you avoid wrapping Connection/Statement/etc and still avoid  
> the problems we discussed with Statement.close()? Can you send me a  
> patch for review?
> -O

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2007-09-08 23:12:48
Subject: Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?
Previous:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2007-09-08 22:57:33
Subject: Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group