Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?
Date: 2007-09-08 23:05:41
Message-ID: 42E8748E-0B9B-4368-A886-F874CAB124B0@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Hi Oliver,

I'm working on the other wrapper driver now. I want to finish
*something* and get it working before I start looking at the issues
that you raised. As you are eluding to it might just be as
complicated to get it right in the driver, but at this point I have
concentrate on the wrapper implementation.

Dave
On 8-Sep-07, at 6:57 PM, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> It's simpler, there's about half a dozen classes and one if
>> statement as opposed to implementing the Connection and Statement
>> interfaces for 3 versions of jdbc and yet another build system
>> that does the same.
>
> How do you avoid wrapping Connection/Statement/etc and still avoid
> the problems we discussed with Statement.close()? Can you send me a
> patch for review?
>
> -O

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2007-09-08 23:12:48 Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2007-09-08 22:57:33 Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?