Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected!

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> IMHO ... most definitely to both ...

Yes to both.

>
>
> On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Sorry to dual-list this, but there's dual aspects to it.
>>
>> EnterpriseDB, Neil Conway and (earlier) Sean Chittenden worked with
>> Coverity to do static code analysis of PostgreSQL. We came up very
>> clean
>> (20 bugs in our 3/4 million lines of code) but part of that was due to
>> previous work. As such, we're now entitled to put a "Coverity
>> Inspected"
>> web sticker up on our site somewhere.
>>
>> So, two questions:
>>
>> 1) Do we want to put up a Coverity Inspected button? On the plus side,
>> Oracle, MySQL and BerkeleyDB (as well as FreeBSD) have all gone through
>> the Coverity checker, so it says good things about our competitiveness to
>> other database products. On the negative side, do we really care?
>>
>> 2) If we want to put up the button, *where*? We don't really have a
>> page
>> on the web site for "certifications and awards", but maybe we ought to?
>>
>> --
>> --Josh
>>
>> Josh Berkus
>> Aglio Database Solutions
>> San Francisco
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>> match
>>
>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions provider, Command Prompt, Inc.
24x7 support - 1.800.492.2240, programming, and consulting
Home of PostgreSQL Replicator, plPHP, plPerlNG and pgPHPToolkit
http://www.commandprompt.com / http://www.postgresql.org