| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux | 
| Date: | 2005-07-19 13:22:11 | 
| Message-ID: | 42DCFE83.4060505@opencloud.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc | 
Dave Cramer wrote:
> setString is "special" because historically this is what we see in  the 
> upgrade problems. People try to insert a date using setString 
> ('dateval') etc.
And we're back to: I think the right solution here is for people to fix 
their broken apps, not to introduce unpredictable behaviour in the driver.
> Also we have historically told people to use setString to insert pg specific types, when there was no corresponding java type.
That's a fair point.
We really need a proper way for specifying this anyway; I had a trivial 
PGobject implementation at one point that did the trick, but Kris didn't 
like the other bits I did in that patch and I never got around to 
implementing it separately.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-19 13:54:19 | Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux | 
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2005-07-19 13:18:35 | Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux |