Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Date: 2005-07-19 13:07:17
Message-ID: 42DCFB05.90306@opencloud.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Dave Cramer wrote:

> by typing it as UNKNOWN we are letting the backend decide what to do
> with it. There is considerable code in there to do the "right" thing.

So you are suggesting we type all parameters as UNKNOWN regardless of
which setXXX() accessor was used to set them?

If not, why is setString() special?

-O

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2005-07-19 13:18:35 Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-07-19 13:04:31 Re: Timestamp Conversion Woes Redux