From: | John A Meinel <john(at)arbash-meinel(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tobias Brox <tobias(at)nordicbet(dot)com> |
Cc: | kjelle(at)bingon(dot)no, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Too slow querying a table of 15 million records |
Date: | 2005-06-28 06:35:07 |
Message-ID: | 42C0EF9B.3070308@arbash-meinel.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tobias Brox wrote:
>[kjelle(at)bingon(dot)no - Tue at 08:33:58PM +0200]
>
>
>>I use FreeBSD 4.11 with PostGreSQL 7.3.8.
>>
>>
>(...)
>
>
>>database=> explain select date_trunc('hour', time),count(*) as total from
>>test where p1=53 and time > now() - interval '24 hours' group by
>>date_trunc order by date_trunc ;
>>
>>
>
>I haven't looked through all your email yet, but this phenomena have been up
>at the list a couple of times. Try replacing "now() - interval '24 hours'"
>with a fixed time stamp, and see if it helps.
>
>pg7 will plan the query without knowledge of what "now() - interval '24
>hours'" will compute to. This should be fixed in pg8.
>
>
>
The grandparent was a mailing list double send. Notice the date is 1
week ago. It has already been answered (though your answer is still
correct).
John
=:->
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-28 06:40:56 | Re: Poor index choice -- multiple indexes of the same columns |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-06-28 06:26:20 | Re: Postgresql7.4.5 running slow on plpgsql function |