Re: User Quota Implementation

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Yann Michel <yann-postgresql(at)spline(dot)de>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: User Quota Implementation
Date: 2005-06-22 18:06:14
Message-ID: 42B9A896.6030501@tvi.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

You're right, this is going to take more work to make sure all is
perfect. Let me work up a formal definition and send it to the group.

Thanks for bringing me back to my senses.

-Jonah

Tom Lane wrote:

>"Jonah H. Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu> writes:
>
>
>>If I recall correctly, I never got a response. I can still get it done
>>quickly and probably before the July 1st feature freeze (if that's still
>>the date). Tom, Bruce, Josh, et al what are your thoughts if I submit a
>>patch in the next few days? Is everyone already too busy reviewing the
>>current patches?
>>
>>
>
>I don't actually believe that this can be done at the drop of a hat ---
>at least not in a way that will perform acceptably. I haven't seen a
>design proposal that looks like it will work, anyway. What do you
>intend to check exactly, where, and how often?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-06-22 18:11:53 Re: commit_delay, siblings
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-06-22 17:53:21 Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity