Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
Date: 2005-06-22 15:41:49
Message-ID: 42B986BD.8060606@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> But this doesn't make it easier to use - users don't just include those who
> write it. The antecedent language of these, Ada, from which this syntax
> comes, was explicitly designed to be reader-friendly as opposed to
> writer-friendly, and this is a part of that.

IMHO it is just needless verbiage that makes programs both harder to
read *and* harder to write, albeit marginally so. I think there is a
reason why Ada-style block terminators are in the minority among
block-structured languages :)

But obviously this is a matter of taste -- does anyone else like or
dislike the current syntax?

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-22 15:45:09 Re: Problem with dblink regression test
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2005-06-22 15:28:26 Re: User Quota Implementation

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-22 15:45:09 Re: Problem with dblink regression test
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-22 11:25:57 Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity