From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The contrib hit list |
Date: | 2005-06-21 23:47:20 |
Message-ID: | 42B8A708.6080002@tvi.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Sounds good to me... just wondering where dblink went? Is it going to
remain a part of the dist?
Sorry if this was already answered, I haven't had the time to check the
archive.
-Jonah
Tom Lane wrote:
>Looking over the thread Josh started a few days ago, it seems there is
>consensus to move these contrib modules into separate projects on
>pgfoundry.org:
>
>adddepend
>dbase
>dbmirror
>fulltextindex
>mSQL-interface
>mac
>oracle
>tips
>
>and to kill these outright:
>
>array
>ipc_check
>miscutil
>mysql
>noupdate
>pg_dumplo
>pg_upgrade
>string
>tools
>tsearch
>xml
>
>There was also a suggestion to move findoidjoins to src/tools, since
>that's where it really belongs.
>
>Finally, various people have expressed interest in writing replacements
>for these:
>
>reindexdb
>userlock
>
>If I don't hear any objections, I'll "cvs delete" the candidates for
>outright kills in a day or two, and the pgfoundry candidates as soon
>as someone moves them over (not being much of a pgfoundry user, I'd
>prefer to let someone else set those projects up). I'll move
>findoidjoins too.
>
>Anyone want to get to work on replacing reindexdb or userlock? It'd
>be real nice to get rid of userlock so that we could have a clean story
>on all-BSD-license for 8.1.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-06-22 00:10:31 | Re: Server instrumentation patch |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-06-21 23:32:14 | Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze |