Re: Problems with pg_dump

From: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)cvc(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Ben Ramsey" <ben(at)eureka-interactive(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Problems with pg_dump
Date: 2003-03-10 19:18:58
Message-ID: 42B794KIFA83OIFCHDOL2ON66ZPOVP.3e6ce522@cal-lab
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Data corruption, bad memory/harddrive?

3/10/2003 10:41:37 AM, "Ben Ramsey" <ben(at)eureka-interactive(dot)com> wrote:

>Reply didn't reply to the list, as I had assumed... it replied to the person
>who sent the message. Oh well... Let's try again. :)
>
>> Is it possible that you have a mismatch between versions of pg_dump
>> and PostgreSQL?
>
>I don't think this is possible since this is the only installation of
>Postgres running on this machine. There was no installation previous to
>this one. Furthermore, there are 12 databases, and only one of them dumps
>correctly with pgdump. The rest of them give me one of these two error
>messages.
>
>Can someone just tell me what these error messages mean so I can get
>underway with debugging this? I needed the dump of at least two of these
>databases last week for our clients.
>
>Thanks.
>
>----------
>
>The error messages, again, are:
>
> dumpClasses(): command failed. Explanation from backend:
> 'pqReadData() -- backend closed the channel unexpectedly.
> This probably means the backedn terminated abnormally
> before or while processing the request.'.
>
>And:
>
> getTables(): SELECT failed. Explanation from backend:
> 'ERROR: aclitemout: bad ai_type: 39'.
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Delao, Darryl W 2003-03-10 19:21:48 Re: General Performance questions
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-03-10 19:17:08 Re: Postgres processes