Re: pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't
Date: 2005-06-20 15:20:54
Message-ID: 42B6DED6.7070806@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

You could also mention under limitations that it's not NULL-safe perhaps.

Chris

Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>
>>Don't forget the line in the GiST docs that says basically that WAL
>>logging is a SMOP:
>>http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/limitations.html
>
>
> Ah, I did forget that one. Thanks.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-06-20 15:22:39 pgsql: fix founded hole in recovery after crash, add
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-20 14:54:03 Re: pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't