Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
Date: 2005-06-20 09:41:07
Message-ID: 42B68F33.4090802@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Dave Page wrote:

>That's what I'm working on atm, and given Tom's previous comment about
>small-footprint users not wanting an extra 5/6MB on the size of a new
>cluster, I'm leaving most things using template1 and mainly just
>updating docs and examples. 'postgres' can then be dropped with no ill
>effects other than a return to the old template1 etc. issues.
>
>
>

I'm confused. I thought avoiding those issues was one of the main
purposes for this.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-06-20 09:48:14 Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-06-20 09:36:47 Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb