Re: LGPL

From: Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LGPL
Date: 2005-06-18 07:43:01
Message-ID: 42B3D085.7060903@knowtion.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>What is important is that it is possible, and useful, to build Postgres
>in a completely non-GPL environment. If that were not so then I think
>we'd have some license issues. But the fact that building PG in a
>GPL-ized environment creates a GPL-ized binary is not a problem from my
>point of view. You've already bought into the GPL if you're using that
>environment.
>
>
So, is there an effort to not require GNU make then ?

Peter

In response to

  • Re: LGPL at 2005-06-18 05:26:16 from Tom Lane

Responses

  • Re: LGPL at 2005-06-18 13:26:50 from Tom Lane
  • Re: LGPL at 2005-06-18 14:23:50 from Bruno Wolff III

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2005-06-18 08:04:38 Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)
Previous Message Robert Treat 2005-06-18 06:38:28 Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)