Re: Autovacuum in the backend

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum in the backend
Date: 2005-06-16 14:04:00
Message-ID: 42B186D0.2020606@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:

> I completly agree with Gavin - integrating this kind of thing into the
> backend writer or integrate it with FSM would be the ideal solution.

Yes AV should look at FSM data, and it will eventually. I'm not sure
how you would integrate AV with the backend writer, but again if
improvements are made to vacuum, AV might have to change along with it,
but I still think it will be needed or at least helpful.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2005-06-16 14:05:01 Re: Autovacuum in the backend
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-06-16 14:01:53 Re: Autovacuum in the backend

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2005-06-16 14:05:01 Re: Autovacuum in the backend
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2005-06-16 14:01:53 Re: Autovacuum in the backend