Re: uptime function to postmaster

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: uptime function to postmaster
Date: 2005-06-15 05:55:59
Message-ID: 42AFC2EF.3050304@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We need to preceed our function names with pg_ for cases like this where
> we are supplying pg-specific behavior.

We do? I'm not sure I can see much of a consistent naming convention for
functions like these: version(), obj_description(), has_xyz_privilege(),
format_type(), set_config(), and the like are surely "pg-specific", for
example.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2005-06-15 06:32:28 Re: dbsize backend integration
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-15 03:15:43 Add PG version number to NLS files