Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>If we don't have a way to check this, we'll regret it soon enough...
>>now maybe a GUC setting isn't the optimal way, but I think we need
>>*some* way besides ps. ps doesn't work remotely and I think there's
>>no simple equivalent under Windows either.
> Sure, but the GUC only reports that it thinks the stats collector
> started, not whether it is running or not. I think 'ps' is a fine way
> to tell.
Um, no such beast under win32. You can only see some postgres processes,
but can't distinguish them. We'd need some functions that examine the
pids known to the postmaster (pg_get_collector_pid, pg_get_logger_pid, ...)
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Bug Finder||Date: 2005-06-14 08:07:41|
|Subject: BUG #1718: geqo_selection.c:linear()|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-06-14 03:08:17|
|Subject: Re: BUG #1707: statistics collector starts with stats_start_collector|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Atsushi Ogawa||Date: 2005-06-14 13:16:05|
|Subject: replace_text() improvement|
|Previous:||From: Neil Conway||Date: 2005-06-14 06:49:51|
|Subject: Re: plpgsql raise - parameters can be expressions|