Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine

From: Donald Courtney <Donald(dot)Courtney(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To:
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
Date: 2005-06-07 19:38:30
Message-ID: 42A5F7B6.20502@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Get FATAL when starting up (64 bit) with large shared_buffers setting

I built a 64 bit for Sparc/Solaris easily but I found that the
startup of postmaster generates a FATAL diagnostic due to going
over the 2GB limit (3.7 GB).

When building for 64 bit is there some other
things that must change in order to size UP the shared_buffers?

Thanks.

Don C.

P.S. A severe checkpoint problem I was having was fixed with
"checkpoint_segments=200".

Message:

FATAL: 460000 is outside the valid range for parameter "shared_buffers"
(16 .. 262143)
LOG: database system was shut down at 2005-06-07 15:20:28 EDT

Mike Rylander wrote:

>On 06 Jun 2005 12:53:40 -0500, Mark Rinaudo <mark(at)bowmansystems(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>>I'm not sure if this is the appropriate list to post this question to
>>but i'm starting with this one because it is related to the performance
>>of Postgresql server. I have a Penguin Computing dual AMD 64 bit
>>opteron machine with 8 Gigs of memory. In my attempt to increase the
>>number of shared_buffers from the default to 65000 i was running into a
>>semget error when trying to start Postgresql. After reading the
>>documentation I adjusted the semaphore settings in the kernel to allow
>>Postgresql to start successfully. With this configuration running if I
>>do a ipcs -u i get the following.
>>
>>
>
>
>On my HP-585, 4xOpteron, 16G RAM, Gentoo Linux (2.6.9):
>
>$ ipcs -u i
>
>------ Shared Memory Status --------
>segments allocated 1
>pages allocated 34866
>pages resident 31642
>pages swapped 128
>Swap performance: 0 attempts 0 successes
>
>------ Semaphore Status --------
>used arrays = 7
>allocated semaphores = 119
>
>------ Messages: Status --------
>allocated queues = 0
>used headers = 0
>used space = 0 bytes
>
>
>Did you perhaps disable spinlocks when compiling PG?
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Arthurs 2005-06-07 19:54:24 Re: Postgresql on an AMD64 machine
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2005-06-07 16:15:21 Re: Debian Stable goes from Woody to Sarge!!