Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jharris(at)tvi(dot)edu>
To: Bricklen Anderson <BAnderson(at)PresiNET(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions
Date: 2005-05-31 21:05:34
Message-ID: 429CD19E.6000407@tvi.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Yes,

That is what I/my clients have been discussing. It is a nifty
performance feature.

Bricklen Anderson wrote:

> Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm sure this has been thought of but was wondering whether anyone
>> had discussed the allowance of run-time block size specifications at
>> the tablespace level? I know that a change such as this would
>> substantially impact buffer operations, transactions, access methods,
>> the storage manager, and a lot of other stuff, however it would give
>> an administrator the ability to inhance performance for specific
>> applications.
>>
>> Arguably, one can set the block size at compile-time, but for a
>> system running multiple databases it *may* be a nice feature. Would
>> it be used a lot? Probably not. Would I use it? Certainly! Would
>> some of my clients use it? Yes.
>>
>> Perhaps a TODO item for some advantageous company to fund?
>>
>> -Jonah
>
>
> Have you used Oracle's version as well?
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2005-05-31 21:10:34 Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-31 21:05:02 Re: Tablespace-level Block Size Definitions