Re: Autoconf update?

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autoconf update?
Date: 2005-05-31 01:49:25
Message-ID: 429BC2A5.904@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Well, it'll still be necessary to keep 2.53 around, unless you want to
> move to 2.59 for future releases of the back branches too ... which
> might be OK, I'm not sure.

I thought it was to help the public not have to keep so many versions
around :)

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-31 04:07:42 Consumer-grade vs enterprise-grade disk drives
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-05-31 01:12:48 Re: [HACKERS] pg_buffercache causes assertion failure