Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)

From: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Date: 2005-05-17 14:16:17
Message-ID: 4289FCB1.4050409@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> It would be useful to outline positions that are actually available for people to take.
> It's easy to give a general list. I've asked and seen may like it. For me, what does
> helping with advocacy mean? What should be performance tested (I assume new code,
> like the bitmap scan). But at the same time, how do I not get into something that is
> being duplicated by somebody else?

I reckon a good newbie task at the moment would be to add ALTER object
SET SCHEMA blah; on all objects...

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-17 14:32:32 Re: Learning curves and such (was Re: pgFoundry)
Previous Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2005-05-17 14:02:14 Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations