Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Thomas F(dot) O'Connell" <tfo(at)sitening(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Date: 2005-05-13 02:03:48
Message-ID: 42840B04.20205@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

>>> As lead phpPgAdmin developer, I'm officially in favour of them. The
>>> main reason being all the extra fruit they have that shows database
>>> size, etc.
>>
>>
>> As non-lead phpPgAdmin developer, I'd be against using them in
>> phppgadmin. (note this doesnt mean I am against them in pgsql itself)
>
>
> Hehe, talk about your democratic institutions :)
>
>

But you have more votes, right?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-05-13 02:06:39 Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-05-13 01:51:57 Re: Views, views, views: Summary of Arguments