Tom Lane wrote:
>"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>As for CVS - if we can't do development the way we want using it then it's
>>time to replace it.
>>
>>
>
>CVS's capabilities (or lack of same) are completely unrelated to the
>matter in hand. What we are talking about is packaging, ie what should
>sensibly go out in the same shipped tarball.
>
>
>
I agree. I was responding to Josh's suggestion that CVS limitations were
driving policy, but your response is more apposite ;-)
cheers
andrew