| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Date: | 2005-05-03 17:14:28 |
| Message-ID: | 4277B174.7020309@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>Not really that ugly. It is just an extra compile step. Besides
>>you don't have to package it just because it is in the Tarball.
>
>
> Since you keep raising that point: Not packaging something is not a
> valid solution to something being hard to package.
Except that I don't consider it difficult. I do it all the time, it can
be easily scripted.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-05-03 17:15:23 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-03 17:11:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-03 17:14:43 | A proper fix for the conversion-function problem |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-05-03 17:11:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |