| From: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-05-02 06:53:46 |
| Message-ID: | 4275CE7A.3070704@opencloud.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> writes:
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>I'm not convinced that Postgres ought to provide
>>>a way to second-guess the TCP stack ...
>
>
>>Would you be ok with a patch that allowed configuration of the
>>TCP_KEEPCNT / TCP_KEEPIDLE / TCP_KEEPINTVL socket options on backend
>>sockets?
>
>
> [ shrug... ] As long as it doesn't fail to build on platforms that
> don't offer those options, I couldn't complain too hard. But do we
> really need all that?
I can't see how you'd aggregate or discard any of those options without
losing useful tuning knobs.. if you're going to have one, you might as
well have them all.
-O
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-05-02 06:56:08 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-05-02 06:52:17 | Re: SPI bug. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2005-05-02 06:56:08 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-02 06:07:07 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |