| From: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: OpenRPT |
| Date: | 2005-04-26 16:41:25 |
| Message-ID: | 426E6F35.3060506@nedscape.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-announce pgsql-general |
Christopher Browne wrote:
> My question would be whether or not it's "batchable" for environments
> where you haven't got X running or available.
>
> It could be nifty to "drag and drool" some reports into place, but
> there are cases where that's only useful if they can subsequently be
> deployed without needing to have either Qt or X available.
Yeah, currently, the Qt library requires X to be running. We have some hope that this won't be the case with Qt4, now in beta. Haven't had much time to play with that yet...
In our OpenMFG ERP product, what we currently do for our Batch Manager application running reports in a way like you're describing is to run it in a VNC server session. Would that be an option for you?
Regards,
Ned
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2005-04-26 19:51:43 | Re: OpenRPT |
| Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2005-04-26 06:52:54 | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2005-04-26 19:51:43 | Re: OpenRPT |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-04-26 02:51:46 | Re: OpenRPT |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ying Lu | 2005-04-26 17:58:09 | About index - "a query or data manipulation command can use at most one index per table" |
| Previous Message | Shelby Cain | 2005-04-26 15:52:05 | Re: Change Windows path to Unix path... |