Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Date: 2005-04-22 19:46:02
Message-ID: 4269547A.10007@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> Basically, if we're going to be *anti-patent*, we need to know the why
>>
>>
>> anti-software-patent
>
>
> You keep differentiating this ... but, in both cases, aren't we
> discussing IP rights?

Well that is not what I started this thread as. I started this thread
about Software Patents.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-04-22 19:55:44 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-04-22 19:23:37 Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-04-22 19:55:44 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-04-22 19:23:37 Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents