Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Date: 2005-04-22 04:15:52
Message-ID: 42687A78.7090402@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www


> The fact this discussion has come up so rarely before indicates it is
> not a major issue for the community.
>
> As I said, come up with some wording that everyone can agree to and
> let's at least make a new item and see how it goes.

Well my vote is for more of a sledgehammer than a feather in this
regard. What does everyone else think is the real question.

>
> I personally know the patent system is a mess, but it is not an
> overriding issue in my work with PostgreSQL.

Your work with PostgreSQL (AFAIK) wouldn't run into the problem. People
like Berkus, myself, EnterpriseDB, Greenplumn, SRA (Yes I know they
employ you), PgSQL, Inc., are who are going to run into the problem.

All due respect but perhaps it is worth considering the issue as a total
community versus just how it affects you.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-22 04:18:29 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-22 04:09:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-22 04:18:29 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-04-22 04:09:08 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Software Patents