Re: New partitioning - some feedback

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New partitioning - some feedback
Date: 2017-07-18 06:26:10
Message-ID: 4265c72a-0b23-5a07-7be1-4403bcb3972f@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/07/2017 02:02 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> I'd prefer *not* to see a table and its partitions all intermixed in the
> same display (especially with nothing indicating which are partitions) -
> as this will make for unwieldy long lists when tables have many
> partitions. Also it would be good if the 'main' partitioned table and
> its 'partitions' showed up as a different type in some way.

I've just read through this thread, and I'm wondering why we can't just
have something like \set SHOW_PARTITIONS true or something, and that
would default to false.
--
Vik Fearing +33 6 46 75 15 36
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-07-18 06:33:07 Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected
Previous Message K S, Sandhya (Nokia - IN/Bangalore) 2017-07-18 05:27:58 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres process invoking exit resulting in sh-QUIT core